Four large corporations control much of the world's booming bottled water industry and pose a threat to public water utilities, according to a report by the Canadian non-governmental Polaris Institute.
The business moves 50 billion dollars a year, and Nestlé, PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Danone companies control the lion's share of the water market, according to the study ''Inside the Bottle''.
''These companies harvest huge profits from water they either obtain for free or at very low cost from public taps,'' Tony Clarke, the author of the book-length report, told Tierramérica.
Up to 20 percent of the U.S. population and 17.5 percent of Canadians now get their drinking water exclusively from bottled sources, Clarke said. According to industry statistics, worldwide sales increased 40 percent between 2000 and 2003, when annual per capita consumption of bottled water averaged 90 litres in the United States and 51 litres in Latin America.
"Bottled water companies' marketing plays on fears about the health and safety of public tap water," said Clarke, though he admitted that there are numerous instances of illness and even deaths from drinking bad tap water, but none directly linked to bottled water.
However, last year 500,000 litres of Coca-Cola's Dasani brand water had to be recalled in the British market because of high levels of bromate, a cancer-causing chemical, Clarke said. The Dasani water is tap water that is filtered and treated.
"Similar types of contamination could be happening elsewhere, but no one is testing the water often enough," he added.
Bottled water is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, says Stephen Kay, spokesman for the International Bottled Water Association. Inspections are conducted by local health authorities, and independent annual inspections are made in each member country.
"We're not trying to discourage consumers from using tap water. People prefer bottled water for it's convenience, safety and health benefits,'' Kay told Tierramérica.
Furthermore, bottled water offers a healthier choice than sugar-rich soft drinks, "which could help Latin America's obesity problem," he said.
If any industry should be nervous about the rapid growth of the bottled water industry, it's soft drink manufacturers, he says.
But Coca-Cola and Pepsi aren't particularly worried, says the Polaris Institute's Clarke, since they have become dominant players in the industry. Coca-Cola has publicly declared that bottled water will be its biggest selling product in a few years.
The France-based Danone, meanwhile, produces the bottled water brands Evian, Volvic, Aqua, and Crystal Springs.
Catherine O'Brien, spokeswoman for Nestlé Canada, said no company officials were available to speak on this issue prior to publication of this issue of Tierramérica. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo did not return calls.
The real worry amongst water rights activists is a cultural shift towards water being seen as a commodity that people should pay a lot of money for, Clarke says.
"There is enormous corporate interest in selling water... Bottled water plays a leading role in conditioning people for the privatisation of public water utilities."
Public opposition to privatisation in North America is strong, following some well-publicised problems with privatisation attempts, says Wenonah Hauter, director of the 'Water for All' campaign of Public Citizen, a U.S. NGO.
Less than 15 percent of water utilities are in private hands in the United States, and the ones that are mainly provide sewage treatment, not drinking water, Hauter said in a Tierramérica interview.
Hauter believes the bottled water sector is also hurting public water utilities because it diverts funds and attention away from improving public water services. "Instead of insisting on healthier tap water, people waste their money buying bottled water," she said.
If there are legitimate concerns about local water, a home water filter is a much cheaper and less wasteful solution, Hauter added.
The tens of billions of bottled water containers manufactured every year have created a huge plastic waste problem. Although recyclable, only a fraction go through that process in the United states. The bulk ends up in landfills.
"We hide our bottle waste in landfills, but in the developing world those bottles are everywhere, including littering the landscape and the ocean," Hauter said. The industry invests huge amounts of money to oppose any deposit system where people would get money for returning their plastic bottles, she added.
But FDA spokesman Kay said "deposit systems are expensive to operate and burden the retailer with having to store all those empty bottles," while curbside recycling programmes are better and easier for consumers.
As for places and countries that do not have such programmes, it is their "duty" to "embrace recycling for the environmental benefit and to feed the demand for recyclable material," he said.
"I feel that these groups that care about health and the environment should be embracing the bottled water industry for what we do to deliver safe, quality water with environmental stewardship at the top of our list," Kay concluded.
(*Originally published Mar. 5 by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)
water Bottle
TAKE A SIP OF REAL WATER.
it's not worth it supporting these evil corporations
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
CANADA: Water - Bottles Versus Faucets
CANADA: Water - Bottles Versus Faucets by Stephen Leahy, IPS March 12th, 2005 |
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11957 |
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Stainless Steel
Would it be smart not to sell plastic water bottles at all? How cool would it be if the only way you could buy water is if it was sold in a stainless steel bottle. You buy your bottle at the store and fill it there as well. If on every corner there was a filling station. At these stations you can fill your bottle with fresh cold water from stainless steel pipes. At the station there would be 5 pumps where you can fill up, you could also adjust the temperature to what you want the water to be. Each bottle would be the same size and shape. This would be expansive to start up but it would make a difference. It would cut down on pollution and would use water more effectively.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
how smart is it?
just on my way to school i was thinking about the dilemma with these water bottle corporations. their business plans must be the stupidest things in the world. this is a slight over view.
1- they depend on the townships to pump water from the local lakes
2- they take the water from the small local plants
3-they drive it to their factory bottle it
4- they sell it to the public
5- the public does not recycle it properly
6- it ends up back in the water that they pump out of.
what boggles my mind is they dont do anything to help the local environment where they pump from. these people are takes mass amounts of water every hour. they basically pump until the lake is dry. once the lake is dry they leave and find a new one.
this is nuts. it is a stupid plan on their part because they will run out and be left with nothing other then a environmental problem. for their business to get any respect they need to give back. they have basically one expense, the bottles. they are making a massive profit on us by selling the water back to us. they need to rehabilitate the areas that they have destroyed. all these people do are create problems with our environment and make lots of money from us for no reason. they have a great scam going but thats it and it only betters their fat wallets as it is now.
1- they depend on the townships to pump water from the local lakes
2- they take the water from the small local plants
3-they drive it to their factory bottle it
4- they sell it to the public
5- the public does not recycle it properly
6- it ends up back in the water that they pump out of.
what boggles my mind is they dont do anything to help the local environment where they pump from. these people are takes mass amounts of water every hour. they basically pump until the lake is dry. once the lake is dry they leave and find a new one.
this is nuts. it is a stupid plan on their part because they will run out and be left with nothing other then a environmental problem. for their business to get any respect they need to give back. they have basically one expense, the bottles. they are making a massive profit on us by selling the water back to us. they need to rehabilitate the areas that they have destroyed. all these people do are create problems with our environment and make lots of money from us for no reason. they have a great scam going but thats it and it only betters their fat wallets as it is now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)